top of page

Search


Public Transit and No-Fault Law: Court of Appeals Clarifies Who Pays
A Closer Look at Priority in Bus-Related Claims In September 2025, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued a published opinion in Michigan Municipal League Liability & Property Pool v Farmers Insurance Exchange. The case asked a straightforward but important question: when an uninsured passenger is injured while boarding a city-operated bus, which insurer is responsible for paying personal injury protection (PIP) benefits? The Case in Brief The City of Niles operates Dial-A-Ride
Slater Seibert
4 days ago2 min read
Â


When Assignments Complicate No-Fault Claims: Michigan Supreme Court Weighs In
In July 2025, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a significant opinion in two consolidated cases: C-Spine Orthopedics, PLLC v Progressive Michigan Insurance Company  and Wallace v Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation . At the center of both disputes was a deceptively simple question: Who is allowed to bring a lawsuit for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits when those rights have already been assigned to someone else?  The Court’s answer was nuanced bu
Slater Seibert
Sep 113 min read
Â


First In, First Out? Not So Fast.
I don’t make the rules. But I think it is well-documented that anytime an attorney is asked a numbers question, they are required to...
Jesse Zapczynski
May 162 min read
Â
bottom of page